Compare two or three offers without entering employer names. Use one currency or converted comparison unit for every money field, then review financial cushion, written evidence, workload, and employer dependency separately.
Do not let one attractive number hide the structure
An offer can show higher guaranteed pay while requiring longer hours, expensive employer housing, weak transport, unclear approvals, or complete dependence on one employer. Another can pay less but leave more after fixed work costs and provide a clearer exit. The tool reports separate signals rather than producing one universal winner.
Saving keeps only the number of offers, evidence bands, and critical-gap count. Entered amounts, employer identities, and comparison labels are not stored.
Transparent methodology
How to interpret this tool
How it works
Each offer keeps money, workload, written evidence, and employer dependency as separate signals. Money entries must use one common comparison currency or unit. No salary amount is converted into a universal quality score.
What the result means
The table shows which offer has the largest entered cushion, clearer written evidence, fewer employer-controlled dependencies, or fewer weekly hours. These are separate observations rather than one winner score.
What it cannot tell you
It cannot supply exchange rates, cost-of-living parity, legal verification, employer reputation, visa probability, or a recommendation to accept an offer.
Worked example
An offer may have the largest guaranteed cushion but weaker written exit terms. The tool keeps both facts visible instead of allowing the higher pay number to erase the evidence gap.